posted
It's a picky subject, to be sure, but why can't these companies release DVDs with either the original movie poster or the VHS cover (which was usually the poster)? A few examples would include Better Off Dead, Valley Girl, the High School Reunion edition of Breakfast Club, Weird Science (with the alternate images of Hall and Smith), and Bachelor Party.
My big gripe is with Bachelor Party. They use the poster image of the guys standing in the doorway of the room, but instead of the original ribbon logo, they slap this ugly, worse-than-comic-sans cheesball font on the cover? These alternate fonts cheapen the DVD covers, and make them look more bootleggish than anything.
I could've designed a better Bachelor Party DVD cover for Fox. Then again, anyone with Photoshop and the magic wand tool could do it too!
Just felt like whining this morning! tenohtwo
Posts: 27 | From: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: Sep 2003 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
cindymancini
Selling underpants to geeks since 1984...
Member # 679
posted
I agree, I hated the new cover of Better Off Dead and Weird Science. Also, I love how the try to give some of the really older 80's movies a new look, such as The Last American Virgin. Have you seen it? There's a girl in a bikini with J. Lo glasses on the front. Ridiculous!!
Posts: 2234 | From: Shopping at the Galleria! | Registered: Jun 2002 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
I would think the original artwork was long gone. I mean, I know in my line of work, when someone comes along 10 years later and says "do you guys still have our original band logo to use for the cover?" I look at them like they are nuts. Art Departments simply don't keep things archived very long, and I would imagine if they are archived on disk somewhere, the turn around of employees, studios, ad agencies and such is so abundant, it could never be found. You know? I mean, most likely, some of the key people that designed that stuff then, are probably at either different jobs or retired now.
Just a thought.
Posts: 59 | From: Dallas, TX | Registered: Jun 2003 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, I have two possible explinations. The first, is basically what Julie said. My other guess is that the companies are trying to modernize the covers to appeal to people who aren't familiar with these older movies. I know that's a bit of a slap in the face to us 80s movie fans, but the studios will do anything to sell more DVDs.
I agree that the new Weird Science DVD cover art looks ridiculous. Anthony Michael Hall looks like he's having a seizure or something Also, I was very disappointed when I saw the Three O'Clock High DVD cover art...it looks too bare. The "3 O'Clock" movie poster is one of my favorites, but on the DVD cover, they cut out the entire background, and it just looks way too sparse.
Posts: 269 | From: Dawson's Garage, I owe $5 | Registered: Sep 2003 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
I could understand the point about modernizing the covers for newer fans, I suppose. In regards to old logos and art, I built part of my Bachelor Party site by simply scanning in the LP soundtrack, isolating the logo, and cleaning it so that it could be used in different environments. There's really nothing modern about the cover except for the new title font. The Better Off Dead poster *was* a cartoonish poster, so maybe someone thought it looked too dated.
I suppose the same gripe could be made for 80s albums that get re-issued with new artwork, a la Depeche Mode and Cocteau Twins.
Jim
Posts: 27 | From: Phoenix, AZ | Registered: Sep 2003 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
Also, I was very disappointed when I saw the Three O'Clock High DVD cover art...it looks too bare. The "3 O'Clock" movie poster is one of my favorites, but on the DVD cover, they cut out the entire background, and it just looks way too sparse.
