posted
Real. Proof is available...
Posts: 2729 | From: Kansas City, MO "At the Enchantment Under the Sea Dance" | Registered: Apr 2007 | Site Updates: 9
| IP: Logged |
posted
Real. As the man said - they went there six times. Why fake it more than once?
Posts: 3646 | From: Shermer, IL - where else? | Registered: Mar 2001 | Site Updates: 37
| IP: Logged |
posted
Of course it was real. To fake something of that would constitute a cover-up bigger than anything Scully & Mulder could ever hope to uncover, which itself strains plausibility given the sheer number of people (1 in 10 people in America worked at least peripherally with the space program during the peak) that would have to be sworn to silence.
Posts: 2561 | From: Pennsylvania | Registered: Aug 2004 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
Because the Russians got there first maybe?
Posts: 4413 | From: Where the streets have no name | Registered: Oct 2002 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
You can actually see evidence of the moon landing with a good telescope. It was real.
Posts: 835 | From: Hawaii | Registered: Aug 2008 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by journey: You can actually see evidence of the moon landing with a good telescope. It was real.
Yes i have seen it several times with my telescopes after a few beers
Just kidding,at 400,000 kilometers Hubble’s resolution on the Moon is about 200 meters. In other words,even a football stadium on the Moon would look like a dot to Hubble.And Hubble doesn't need to worry about the unsteady atmosphere.So from the Ground?no chance,not ever imo
Here`s a pic with my backyard telescope around 20% of about 2000 video frames merged down to one clear image.Resolution at best 2km.
Posts: 362 | From: Third rock from the sun | Registered: Nov 2007 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
Another shot,this time the Apollo 11 landing site.This is just one single photo,the best one of around 200-300 shots that night.Since this is not a video stack,the resolution here is about 4km.But at the best i manage around 1/10th of the resolution of Hubble,not bad considering it is just a 400$ telescope
Posts: 362 | From: Third rock from the sun | Registered: Nov 2007 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
You're right, bandit. I was thinking about the images of debris, footprints, lunar landers, remnants of science experiments, etc. that they have recent photographic evidence of, but that was actually imaged by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, not from Earth.
Posts: 835 | From: Hawaii | Registered: Aug 2008 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
Mankind largest achievement,and there are people out there trying to make some money out of those HOAX theories.
Worst thing though,some actually believe it.Sometimes i wonder how stupid some people are.Even Galileo Galilei 400 years ago had more sense
The second man on the moon Buzz aldrin over 70 (respect) approached called a liar and a coward in public...On another clip this guy(sibrel) ask if they got that on tape.probably hoping to make a few more $ i guess.
posted
Seeing as you people are talking about whether the Moon landings are either real or faked, I thought that I might as well tell you about this film given that you may enjoy it, even though it concerns Mars and not the Moon. Capricorn One (1978) is about the first manned flight to Mars, which is in fact faked as a NASA official, played by Hal Holbrook, decided that a real one would be too dangerous, so it is staged in a television studio. Then, when the Pentagon announces that the capsule burnt up on re-entry, then the three astronaunts -- James Brolin, Sam Waterson and O.J. Simpson -- suddenly realise that they are going to be murdered on the government's orders so that they never share their secret with anybody at all. Meanwhile, investigative reporter Elliott Gould thinks that something suspicious is going on and decides to look into it.
[ 31. July 2009, 02:50: Message edited by: LoverswithCassie ]
Posts: 1756 | From: Australia. | Registered: Mar 2009 | Site Updates: 203
| IP: Logged |
posted
yeah I did see that one,maybe one of the reason so many people thought the moon landings were staged in a Hollywood studio.Great flick though
Posts: 362 | From: Third rock from the sun | Registered: Nov 2007 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Chris the CandyFanMan: Of course it was real. To fake something of that would constitute a cover-up bigger than anything Scully & Mulder could ever hope to uncover, which itself strains plausibility given the sheer number of people (1 in 10 people in America worked at least peripherally with the space program during the peak) that would have to be sworn to silence.
That pretty much sums it up
Posts: 362 | From: Third rock from the sun | Registered: Nov 2007 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well they did filmed simulations as part of their training and photos of that are often used to "prove" the hoax theory since it shows the astronauts on mock moon settings with model ships, etc.
Posts: 835 | From: Hawaii | Registered: Aug 2008 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
Kash
Kash : Aha! He'll save every one of us...
Member # 297
quote:Originally posted by Chris the CandyFanMan: Of course it was real. To fake something of that would constitute a cover-up bigger than anything Scully & Mulder could ever hope to uncover, which itself strains plausibility given the sheer number of people (1 in 10 people in America worked at least peripherally with the space program during the peak) that would have to be sworn to silence.
Good observation, but at the same time you could say that they couldn't keep it a secret, and that's precisely why people are talking about it today. An accusation of conspiracy is IMO the manifestation of serious collective doubt, inside information and public suspicion.
Posts: 2041 | From: The Ice Planet Hoth | Registered: Jul 2001 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |