posted
nice pics stitch !! love the toilet too funny!! how come we can't post avatar's or profile pics here anyways? just wondering?
Posts: 1236 | From: buffalo, new york | Registered: Nov 2008 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
JDoc, we've actually had rain this winter. Makes a nice change from the normal drought!
Posts: 3839 | From: Wangaratta, Vic, Australia | Registered: Jun 2004 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
On this day, pics don't get much cooler than this.
Posts: 3646 | From: Shermer, IL - where else? | Registered: Mar 2001 | Site Updates: 37
| IP: Logged |
posted
That IS very interesting. I wonder if anyone has more detailed pics?
Posts: 2729 | From: Kansas City, MO "At the Enchantment Under the Sea Dance" | Registered: Apr 2007 | Site Updates: 9
| IP: Logged |
posted
Paul, those pics are cool. I'm not one of those conspiracists that thinks the moon landing was fake, but looking at these pictures,I wonder if they are real or not. The shadow of the lunar module is going in the opposite direction to the shadows in the craters!
Posts: 3839 | From: Wangaratta, Vic, Australia | Registered: Jun 2004 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Stitch Groover: Paul, those pics are cool. I'm not one of those conspiracists that thinks the moon landing was fake, but looking at these pictures,I wonder if they are real or not. The shadow of the lunar module is going in the opposite direction to the shadows in the craters!
No it's not. What you are seeing in the craters is exactly what you would see if the crater is a hole, rather than a bump. The darkest shadow is inside the crater, under the edge nearest the light source. The lightest bit is the inside edge furthest from the light source, and a hole throws no shadow outside it's perimeter.
Posts: 3646 | From: Shermer, IL - where else? | Registered: Mar 2001 | Site Updates: 37
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by jdocster McFly you Irish bug: That IS very interesting. I wonder if anyone has more detailed pics?
They took these pictures whilst they were settling into the final orbital pattern. Once the high-def pics of these sites are taken, they should give clarity of around 3x the sharpness that we see here.
For comparison, this is one that was taken of another similarly-sized area - the first hi-def ones available:
Posts: 3646 | From: Shermer, IL - where else? | Registered: Mar 2001 | Site Updates: 37
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Paul Dangerously, you iceholes....: </font><blockquote><font size="1" face=""Century Gothic", Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face=""Century Gothic", Verdana, Arial">Originally posted by Stitch Groover: Paul, those pics are cool. I'm not one of those conspiracists that thinks the moon landing was fake, but looking at these pictures,I wonder if they are real or not. The shadow of the lunar module is going in the opposite direction to the shadows in the craters! </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face=""Century Gothic", Verdana, Arial">No it's not. What you are seeing in the craters is exactly what you would see if the crater is a hole, rather than a bump. The darkest shadow is inside the crater, under the edge nearest the light source. The lightest bit is the inside edge furthest from the light source, and a hole throws no shadow outside it's perimeter.
Gotcha, thanks.
Posts: 3839 | From: Wangaratta, Vic, Australia | Registered: Jun 2004 | Site Updates: 0
| IP: Logged |