My wife got home and went to check on the girls and walked in during the party scene and was going to watch the end of the movie with them. She nearly lost it when she sees two teenagers on a bed obviously close to having sex. She did lose it when she sees a guy pulling the pants down of a young lady and then sees these two people obviously in a sexual position.
My wife and I were shocked when we watched these scenes again and you see some type of black patch near this girls private parts that to my wife and I looked like it could be this girls pubic hair.
She nearly killed me when she found out that I gave our daughter permission to watch this movie.
How in the world did they get this into a PG rating or how did this movie not get like a PG-13 or even R?
I remember the first scene you mention - it's actually pretty pivotal to the plot, so taking it out would damage the movie, and the ratings guys probably viewed this as not warranting in itself a rating higher than PG.
As far as the second scene goes, I really can't recall it. I'll need to view the movie again to see what it is you mean, but it sounds possible that having been surprised by one scene, you were expecting more, and therefore were not dissapointed. You say that it 'looked like it could be' something you object to. To get a PG rating (especially back in the 80s) I'd say it certainly would not have been pubic hair, otherwise it'd be all over the web. Maybe you are seeing stuff that isn't there, just because you are lokking for more evidence to back up your previous concern over the movie's content.
Still, if you view all of the movies and tv shows that your daughter watches before she does, it'll never happen again.
- Paul
I think you're looking too hard (sorry, couldn't resist).
Ali brings up a good point. Parents are being warned that there may be content unsuitable for kids. It wasn't heavy on the sex tones so it got a PG.
But like PG-13, parents are "strongly cautioned" meaning "Look out! This has some heavy stuff in it".
Things are getting too politically correct in some areas, and films is one area - a lot of UK DVDs are cut for certain content (headbutts, flick/butterfly knives & num-chukas, however you spell that) and some are cut by studios to get a lower rating so what you get on DVD isn't what was shown in the cinema.
The tv broadcasters also cut films sometimes, for years I had Explorers taped off tv and only when I got the VHS last year I noticed they cut the "elephantitis is when something gets ugly and bloated like your ass" and another line or two, yet the film has a U (Universal for all) rating...